The case for mandatory sequestration
- The fact that cumulative carbon dioxide emissions are more important than annual emission rates calls for a fresh approach to climate change mitigation. One option would be a mandatory link between carbon sequestration and fossil fuel extraction.
- Publication status:
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher copy:
- Copyright holder:
- Macmillan Publishers Ltd
- Copyright date:
- The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page. Citation: Allen, M. R. et al. (2009). 'The case for mandatory sequestration', Nature Geoscience 2(12), 813-814. [Available at http://www.nature.com/ngeo/].
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record