Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules are suboptimal: a systematic review

Abstract:

Objectives

To evaluate design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules (CPRs).

Study Design and Setting

We conducted a systematic review. Impact studies of cardiovascular CPRs were identified by forward citation and electronic database searches. We categorized the design of impact studies as appropriate for randomized and nonrandomized experiments, excluding uncontrolled before-after study. For impact... Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.016

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
ContEd
Department:
Continuing Education
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6433-1250
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Oxford college:
St Cross College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-0230-0571
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
ContEd
Department:
Continuing Education
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-9258-4060
Publisher:
Elsevier Publisher's website
Journal:
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Journal website
Volume:
133
Pages:
111-120
Publication date:
2021-01-26
Acceptance date:
2021-01-21
DOI:
EISSN:
1878-5921
ISSN:
0895-4356
Pmid:
33515655
Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
1159149
Local pid:
pubs:1159149
Deposit date:
2021-02-17

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP