Journal article icon

Journal article

Searle's Wager

Abstract:

Nicholas Agar has recently argued that it would be irrational for future human beings to choose to radically enhance themselves by uploading their minds onto computers. Utilizing Searle’s argument that machines cannot think, he claims that uploading might entail death. He grants that Searle’s argument is controversial, but he claims, so long as there is a non-zero probability that uploading entails death, uploading is irrational. I argue that Agar’s argument, like Pascal’s wager on which it i...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Research group:
Oxford Centre for Neuroethics; Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
Role:
Author
More from this funder
Funding agency for:
Levy, N
Grant:
086041/Z/08/Z
Journal:
AI & SOCIETY Journal website
Volume:
26
Issue:
4
Pages:
363-369
Publication date:
2011-11-01
Language:
English
Keywords:
Subjects:
UUID:
uuid:31e2c5d1-e285-4166-a6a1-01cdd6219870
Local pid:
ora:10552
Deposit date:
2015-03-13

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP