Journal article icon

Journal article

Reply to Vinken and Vogels

Abstract:

In their comment, Vinken and Vogels [1] take issue with our claim [2] that "IT neurons encode long-term, latent probabilistic information about stimulus occurrence". They offer a biologically plausible model of our findings, which they argue is based on neuronal fatigue. However, like our account, their model includes latent variables that are modulated slowly with stimulus probability; models without such latent processes, such as those based on temporally local fatigue effects, cannot expla...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.021

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Oxford college:
University College
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
Experimental Psychology
Oxford college:
Wadham College
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Elsevier Publisher's website
Journal:
Current Biology Journal website
Volume:
27
Issue:
22
Pages:
R1212-R1213
Publication date:
2017-11-20
Acceptance date:
2017-10-21
DOI:
EISSN:
1879-0445
ISSN:
0960-9822
Pmid:
29161557
Source identifiers:
803382
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:803382
UUID:
uuid:36f6c4a8-b611-4db3-a002-da012982285b
Local pid:
pubs:803382
Deposit date:
2019-05-13

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP