Journal article
Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.
- Abstract:
-
Background
Although randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered ‘gold standard’ evidence, they are not always feasible or appropriate, and may represent a select population. Observational studies provide a useful alternative to enhance applicability, but results can be biased due to confounding.
Aim
To explore the utility of propensity scores for causal inference in an observational study.
Design and setting
Comparison of the effect of amoxi...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Funding
European Clinical Trials Database
More from this funder
UK Clinical Research Network
More from this funder
Research Foundation - Flanders
More from this funder
National Institute for Social Care and Health Research
More from this funder
Expand funders...
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners Publisher's website
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice Journal website
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 662
- Pages:
- e643-e649
- Publication date:
- 2017-08-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-02-23
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Pmid:
-
28760739
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:710255
- UUID:
-
uuid:4f9c7a41-c7d0-4aad-a9e5-f0a6ef305836
- Local pid:
- pubs:710255
- Deposit date:
- 2018-01-12
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2017
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record