Measurement errors and multidimensional poverty
Under quite likely conditions, data measurement errors can cause an (upward) bias in unidimensional poverty estimates and thus mislead both conceptual analyses and policy implications. In the case of multidimensional poverty, we find that by proposing a dual cut-off strategy, the Alkire-Foster method will typically attenuate this bias. With data from a 2010 Living Standard Measurement Survey (LSMS) from Peru, we find empirical evidence in support of this virtue of the dual cut-off strategy.
- Publication status:
- Peer review status:
- Reviewed (other)
(Version of record, pdf, 412.5KB)
- Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI) Publisher's website
- OPHI working paper
- Publication date:
- Paper number:
- Copyright holder:
- Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative
- Copyright date:
- Copyright © Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative 2012. This publication is copyright, however it may be reproduced without fee for teaching or non-profit purposes, but not for resale. Formal permission is required for all such uses, and will normally be granted immediately. For copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from OPHI and may be subject to a fee.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record