Journal article
Citizens with benefits
- Abstract:
-
Can states permissibly enforce mandatory participation in the provision of public goods? Usual justifications of state action here appeal to the fact that such goods are very good for people. Ripstein argues that states can compel provision of public goods but that the best explanation of this is grounded not in the costs and benefits of the provision to the compelled parties but in the parties’ moral status as independent agents. I argue that Ripstein’s alternative account poses more problem...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume Journal website
- Volume:
- 96
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 41-58
- Publication date:
- 2022-05-31
- Acceptance date:
- 2020-12-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1467-8349
- ISSN:
-
0309-7013
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1262364
- Local pid:
- pubs:1262364
- Deposit date:
- 2022-06-05
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- The Aristotelian Society
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Rights statement:
- © 2022 The Aristotelian Society
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record