Where did identification go?
We recently introduced a general method [1,2] and provided a specific cross Development Report (the MPI) as part of the 2010 Human Development Report [4,11] to complement existing methods. Our recent piece in the Journal of Economic Inequality (JEI) (also OPHI Working Paper 43) sought to clarify the presentation and address possible misunderstandings . The present note – a longer version of the one published in JEI – responds to Martin Ravallion’s paper in the same issue, and also benef...Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Peer review status:
- Reviewed (other)
(Version of record, pdf, 200.4KB)
- Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI) Publisher's website
- OPHI working paper
- Publication date:
- Paper number:
- Copyright holder:
- Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative
- Copyright date:
- Copyright © Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative 2007. This publication is copyright, however it may be reproduced without fee for teaching or non-profit purposes, but not for resale. Formal permission is required for all such uses, and will normally be granted immediately. For copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from OPHI and may be subject to a fee. This article follows on from, and should be read in conjunction with, "Understandings and Misunderstandings of Multidimensional Poverty Measurement," by Sabina Alkire and James Foster (also published as OPHI Working Paper 43) and "On Multidimensional Indices of Poverty" by Martin Ravallion.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record