Journal article
Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments
- Abstract:
-
Conjoint analysis is a common tool for studying political preferences. The method disentangles patterns in respondents’ favorability toward complex, multidimensional objects, such as candidates or policies. Most conjoints rely upon a fully randomized design to generate average marginal component effects (AMCEs). These measure the degree to which a given value of a conjoint profile feature increases, or decreases, respondents’ support for the overall profile relative to a baseline, averaging a...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 522.8KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1017/pan.2019.30
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Political Analysis Journal website
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 207-221
- Publication date:
- 2019-08-07
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-05-10
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1476-4989
- ISSN:
-
1047-1987
- Source identifiers:
-
1036398
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1036398
- UUID:
-
uuid:febe9ba9-1035-4e89-ba36-8ac062cb069c
- Local pid:
- pubs:1036398
- Deposit date:
- 2019-07-31
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Leeper, Hobolt, and Tilley
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: 10.1017/pan.2019.30
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record